From Heidi:
"What followed after that would be key. Would it just be a friendly guy/person/whatever or would it be skeezy dude who then tried to hit on me? If the former, fine. If the latter, then the tirade. Much as I like SP, I thought that post was overreacting."From Laura:
"Is the solution to see all subway rides as merely transitional space between our real work and social spaces and therefore not available for the possibility of other connections? Maybe in a society where privilege is so invisible to those who have it the answer is yes. But I truly hope we can figure out a different way to negotiate our world so that language which is truly intended to expand our universes and give us opportunity to make new connections isn't always reduced to confrontations of opposing powers."
And just for you:
From starling:
"Hey, Shannon--take a look at the commentary over on SP. I think you may begin to understand that this is a huge trigger for many women because of the exceedingly common creep-threat factor that we experience in these interactions. I think men in general are pretty oblivious to the amazing and horrible ways in which their fellow men harass women on a regular basis."From Bree:
"If we aren't allowed to talk to each other or make random non-threatening comments on each other's clothing, accessories, etc., then it's a pretty sad world."From Anonymous:
"I understand that men harass women far, far too often and I understand that women should be allowed to decide where and when they want to interact with men. But I'm really floored at the suggestion that a simple interaction between two people could be considered harassment (and yes, I live in a major city and take public transportation every day). If anything, it seems as though the guy in the comic was experiencing both a massive attack of low self-esteem and an attempt to be as respectful of the girl as possible. And basically, the comic just made me wonder...male or female, how valuable could some strangers have ended up being to my life if only I'd been brave enough to talk to them/vice versa."From Ruth:
"Let me give you an example that's happened to me more than once: I'm in the bus, reading a book. I'm in no mood to talk. Some guy sits next to me and asks, "What are you reading?" Or, "Oh, I've heard about that book--how is it?" Even if I very politely say that I don't want to talk, I am likely to be called a bitch (or worse). If I start talking, then I have to listen to the guy talk about his opinions about the book, etc., etc. And I should have a choice of whether or not I want to talk. But I usually don't."And the winner for the best summation, Whiner:
"Naturally, everyone is wrong except me, so I will explain. :)And Fat Acceptance, I'm just going to let your comment stand as is. :)
The comic was not intended to be offensive, I think that's fairly clear. And really, if you read carefully, Shapely Prose etc don't *think* the comic was meant to be offensive. I have never seen anyone actually think that the stick-figure guy is meant to be a pervert or rapist!
Most readers of xkcd can recognise that both male and female geeks can be lonely, unable to communicate, and shoot themselves in the foot. Many such readers just smiled wistfully upon reading it and thought it was cute.
So what's the problem? Well, part of the problem is that there really are these guys out there who think that women exist for no other reason than to attract men, and after having had to deal with enough crap from those guys, many women are a little touchy about a comic that appears to say "See? She REALLY WANTS you to bother her!"
And when that comic first came out, comment threads immediately started up with lonely guys who were getting the message that they should be more outgoing and approach strangers more, and asking for the secret strategies of how to make women like them.
And they got advice. Unsurprisingly, this advice NEVER involved "Say hello. If the other person doesn't respond, or just grunts hi and goes back to what she's doing, leave her alone." It was always bizarre complicated rituals to force women into interacting with them...
Now, XKCD is not a dating guide, and it is not their job to hold the reader's hand and teach them exactly how to deal with members of the appropriate sex in every single strip. However, the content of this strip did legitimately, for some readers, trigger a sigh and a "Please don't encourage them!""
12 comments:
Wiping tears of joy from my eyes! Sigh. Best. Comedy. Show. EVER!
I'm another MST3K lover. That show has contributed to me falling down laughing so hard I end up in tears.
But back to the other discussion---Shapely Prose, for me, is no longer a place where I feel comfortable really making myself heard on anymore. When it comes to FA, they say some extremely profound things. But I have seen commenters get chased away very nastily for daring to have different opinions, some of them which had some good points. I know they make no bones about being who they are, but if they are only going to allow one viewpoint (agree with me or else), not only does it make the blog boring and predictable, it turns off people who may become future potential allies. That's why on my blog, I don't get political and talk about hot-button issues. I want people from all walks of life to visit me, not be scared away because they actually dare to have another thought that isn't the same as mind. It's their blog and SP can do what they want, but the hive mind mentality really needs to stop.
BTW, the above post is my blogger name. It's Bree, who commented on your post last night.
Bree,
I LOVE dissenting opinions. When people shout down dissenting opinions it usually seems like its because they aren't as secure in their rhetoric as they would seem. Either that or their opinions are so inflexible that no amount of persuasion to the contrary can make them rethink their ideas.
To me, opinions must be malleable or what becomes most important is maintaining the status quo rather than getting closer to the truth. The more desperate people are to maintain the status quo, the more dismissive they are of opposing viewpoints.
I won't shy away from hot button topics, and now that I don't feel like I'm out here alone in my frustration with the inability to express alternative views, I will speak up a bit more often. Feel free to add or dissent at any time. :)
Peace,
Shannon
Laura,
When I first started Atchka! I wanted to do MST trivia, but I had no readers then. You and Lesley from Fatshionista have inspired me to start it up again. Look for a new edition soon.
Peace,
Shannon
Heads up - "Fat Acceptance" is a troll who relentlessly stalked my old blog. When I changed my comment system, making it harder to comment, "Fat Acceptance" threw a hissy fit about it. She called me petty names and swore up and down.
Take note - "Tara" is next. Just a friendly warning.
I'm fairly lenient on trolls. The only line they can't cross is being overtly offensive to people. I'm okay with people coming on and saying, "But being fat is dangerous..." Unless we engage these people in conversation, they'll only hear their own side reinforced. Who knows, I may change my mind later. Thanks for the warning.
Peace,
Shannon
By way of background information I get the impression 'Fat Acceptance' is a troll with possible links to MyFatSpouse and Conrad Blickenstorfer's feederism / pornographication agenda. Other posters suggest that s/he 'does the rounds' of FA blogs right across the political spectrum, not to mention trolling the BFB boards earlier in the year before being ceremoniously hit with the ban stick. S/he certainly doesn't in any way speak for me and whilst I may agree with some of the points made in this person's latest post, I find the majority of their expressed views in other fora repugnant.
On the SP echo chamber I think Bree sums up my own thoughts perfectly. I can't deny I have concerns about the high profile and authoritative stance of somewhere as divisive and uncompromising in its opinions, which due to the authors' uncanny knack of being treated as more than a mere curiosity by sections of the mass media, seems to have become mistaken by outsiders as a representative mouthpiece for the huge diversity and plurality of voices within FA. However this aside, I actually happen to agree with them on the topic in hand. Even were I not now happily married I'd never dream of approaching a lone woman on a bus or train. It's simply not appropriate, and I would question both the motives and the immense ego / sense of entitlement of any who considered it otherwise. Dislike of unwanted social interaction is not an exclusively female thing, and I hate being approached on public transportation - it's irritating and intrusive when all I want to do is endure my overpriced, overcrowded journey to the sanctuary of my house inside the bubble created by my iPod with minimum fuss. As a male I have the luxury of merely being a bit 'put out'; I can get off that bus or train at the other end and think no more about it. This is where the experience differs, since I am privileged in that I needn't fear subsequent harassment or much worse on top of that temporary sense of annoyance.
I don't particularly like the way that male bloggers and commentators seem to have been marginalised by a fatosphere in which the discourse has shifted toward recasting fat oppression as an exclusively female issue inflicted upon women by 'douchehounds' (i.e. men). However perhaps we as FA men also have ourselves to blame for that, for not speaking louder or being more persuasive in order to state our case and make our voices heard. Several of the main FA blogs have actually specifically appealed for male writers and in each case I've dodged out for fear that I didn't have anything worthwhile to say or that yes, I'd be criticised for my sometimes inadequate knowledge of sensitive and complex social justice concepts and their associated terminology. Eventually, through lack of new arguments I ended up angrily regurgitating fat-related news stories onto the BFB forums for others to comment upon, and there's only so long one can do that without exploding head syndrome. That aside, it's always encouraging to see a new male voice raising and discussing fat and fat issues, as seems to be happening here, and long may it continue :o)
Thanks Richie. I'm not terribly worried about Fat Acceptance. I think we're all adults here and can handle a person whose opinions are repulsive. I haven't seen it from Fat Acceptance yet, but if something crosses the line I'll put an end to it. My theory is that the right to free speech should reign until it crosses into others' right to feel comfortable (on my blog). I hope that the people who are drawn to Atchka! are the kinds of people who will be able to handle a troll themselves without resorting the censorship. But I stand ready to be judge, jury and executioner.
In the comments of "Tom Cruise's Lament —" I made a similar point to you: strangers who try to force a conversation is irritating regardless of sex, but women clearly have more reason to be wary. In that situation, though, it is incumbent upon the recipient of unwanted attention to make their discomfort known AFTER the conversation has been started.
Person A: Nice laptop
Person B: Mmmm (passive aggressive grunt)
Person A: You come here often?
If the interaction ends after the grunt, then all is well, but if it continues, then Person B is free to say whatever he/she wishes to end the uncomfortable situation. Even so, there isn't really a need to be rude or angry toward an insistent stranger. They may just be one of those irritating people who needs to talk constantly. I hate those people, but I would never yell at them or humiliate them. At most, I ignore them until they get the signal.
Regarding male bloggers: yeah, I've felt unwelcome in some corners, but not all. In fact, the past few days I've felt nothing but love from many female bloggers and readers. Until that point, I was feeling awfully lonely here at Atchka! If I didn't love writing so much, I might have just faded into the woodwork as well. But Atchka! is my forum for all subjects of interest to me, including FA. So, I'll be here, regardless of the response from the rest of the Fatosphere, and you're welcome to add to the dialogue. Thanks for stopping by.
Peace,
Shannon
Shannon, gotta direct you to SP again. "Leave me be" works, sometimes. But then there's the once in a thousand times where you try to cut the conversation off and someone, oh, TRIES TO LIGHT YOU ON FIRE. (Maybe not you, Shannon. Probably just a girl thing there.) Or, failing incineration, just cops a feel, or pushes into your space, or starts threatening to fuck your ass. Those are not uncommon. Or just goes into, "How come you don't want to talk to me pretty laydee, c'mon don't be a frigid bitch babe just talk to a lonely guy here." If you see what I'm saying. Guys who don't respond to NO are actually dangerous--some more than others--if you're a woman. I doubt you get that response at all, ever, if you cut off an annoying conversation.
God, yes, the vast majority of men do not do this stuff. But once is plenty to make most women a little gunshy, and it's enough to make us suggest that perhaps being rude to strangers is not the worst thing ever. There's also the question of what's rude. Is a curt nod and, "Thanks" rude? Depends on whether or not its recipient decides to think so, and when the interaction is a jacked-up power trip (as many holla-interactions are), perhaps he will.
The SP thread is interesting because of the sheer level of fear and personal experience that comes through, and the consequent anger. This is not a minor deal.
So women would be vastly more comfortable if the non-creep men in the world would wait until there is a clear avenue of escape and a lot of other people around before you approach us. You know, so we can cut and run if you're a psycho. Also, when we are sending "Get lost" messages, respect them.
Starling, I'd like to draw an analogy, and feel free to tell me if I'm off base.
What you're describing reminds my of my friend Larry's opinion of black people. He comes from a backwoods part of Illinois, so he already had prejudice built in. But then he moves to Belleville, where things like that bus beating happen with alarming frequency. Or he gets a new black neighbor that doesn't take care of his lawn and (possibly) deals drugs. (I'm simply giving Larry's side, these are not my opinions, btw). So, these are the moderately bad things he witnesses.
And then there are the really bad things, like how his daughter, who works at a gas station, has been robbed at gunpoint twice by two teenagers (they eventually arrested).
Now, Larry has personal experience with extremely unpleasant black people and when he sees black people at his daughter's gas station he gets nervous. His hair stands up on end. He worries that they might want to do something to him or they might be armed.
That particular black person has not done anything specific against Larry or his daughter, but because of the negative associations with black people at the gas station, he is understandably concerned.
How do you handle that situation? Does Larry's daughter not serve black people to avoid the few times when something bad has happened? Or does she prepare for a bad encounter, but give each black person the benefit of the doubt? Or is there a third option?
(By the way, Veronica used to carry Bear Spray with her, so if one of those creeps fucked with her, they'd get an eyeful.)
I see how women would be gunshy of the situation, but it seems to me that even if all the non-creep men held back, the creeps would still be there and you'd still have to be on your guard. Removing the nonthreatening element does not reduce the threat itself. If anything, it seems like it would condense it, so that EVERY interaction with a stranger would be potential danger.
I don't know. I don't know how I would handle it if I were a woman. I'd arm myself, to be sure, but I think I would try to give most men the benefit of the doubt. And for that one on the powertrip, I would cling to the Bear Spray.
Peace,
Shannon
Shannon, glad you have a optimistic perspective on troll. Love your blog, btw.
Post a Comment